Intruc(c)iones

Cada vez que leen un escrito mío y no le ponen “me gusta”, muere un hada.

Bienvenidos a mi blog.

Los escritos son ficción. Les ruego que hagan el esfuerzo de imaginarse a los personajes que invento diciendo las cosas que dicen (y no a mí).
Los que son anécdotas o mi opinión están firmados con mi nombre.

Saludos,
Alessio.AguirrePimentel@gmail.com

PD: Si alguno está interesado en mi  sugestivo y misterioso accionar profesional, tengan a bien visitar http://alessioaguirre.com

And then…

“Well”, she said. “I am sorry I reacted that way. I am not sure why, but I think it’s just that I feel… I sometimes get this strange feeling, I feel liked by you -I am sorry, I know you don’t- and I do not want you to like me, I do not wish to be liked  -or feel liked I should say-  it makes me upset. It makes me mad, it bothers me, so I reacted violently to your twisted sense of humor -if one can call it that-”.

I wished I still smoked.

“It’s OK , I told her and she meditatively said “no, it is not. I am sorry. I know it’s my problem and you should not have to deal with it. This happens to me from time to time. You have given me no reason to feel this way, but I still get like this; I am sorry” and then she went on to talk about her job and family, and her impending trip abroad.

“Well, those are all valid reasons to be stressed”, I said. “It’s quite normal, but, let’s be clear on one thing, I do like you”. There was a small pause in which I allowed her to gather her thoughts; “You have made it clear you do not wish to like me, and I intend to honor your implicit wish, of acting as if you didn’t -do not want you to feel pressured and hurt your delicate canadian sensibilities- but you have sort of dropped the fact that ‘you think I like you’ as a fallacy and went on with your speech -a tacit request for me to pretend it is all just a misunderstanding- yet I am afraid I will not comply with your request, I will not pretend I do not like you, regardless of the fact that you are willing to pretend that you do not like me.”

“Peter, but I do not like you, or ‘not that way’, as I recall the proper phrasing is, if my memory from my college years serves me right” I jumped in interrupting her,”look, you obviously do not wish to talk about this, as you have subconsciously devised this plan to establish this pact, this agreement of an idea, in which we were to pretend that we do not like each other, so there is no need to talk about it, as long as it’s clear that you wish that you didn’t, but you do, and you wish that I didn’t, but I do”.

She spoke with the little air she had in her lungs, obviously perturbed by the twist of events “but!, but!, I don’t even know where to start, you telling me what I feel, or who I like, I do not mean to be insensitive, but I truly, really, positively do not like you”.

“Sweety, I am the first person you call in the morning, and the last person with whom you speak at night. We text each other all day long, we hang out all day, we make plans, we tell each other all we feel and think, we share favorite books and movies, we ask each other what we like and hate, we tell each other how we want to raise our children and all that. Trust me, you like me. You may have the shadow of a particularly significant ex-boyfriend following you around or some such thing, and that’s all fine and dandy, but trust me, I know when a girl likes me, and you like me plenty”.

She said in a matter of fact tone of voice “And you have got to trust me when I tell you that I know when I like a guy -’shadow’ of an ex-boyfriend or not- and you also have got to trust me on this one, I do not like you, I am sorry to say”.

“OK”, I told her, “so; how was your day? besides all the stuff with your family”. “No,” she said, “No. I am sorry but we are not going to just leave it at that; if we are going to be friends, and I hope we are, I demand we agree on the fact that…” I interrupted her again; “we do not need to agree on anything”; and she said “but we do. Look, perhaps this is just your way of dealing with it, you may feel rejected, but don’t, you are a” and I said “please do not give me the ‘you are a great guy’ speech. I do not care to hear it; since, as it turns out, I am a great guy. If you really didn’t like me -but you do- it would not mean anything. Some women like me, some don’t, it’s not big deal; it just so happens that you belong to the group that does” and she could hear the smile in my voice. She snorted a laugh and said “well, I am sorry I do not think you are the amazing guy you seem to think you are” and I jumped in, saying “that’s OK, I’ve known myself longer than you, I know myself better than you, and so I can tell you, I am a great guy” and we both laughed.

“I thought about this long last night, before I went to bed” I said. “Perhaps it’s a mixture of things, bad timing for sure, but also, I guessed I do not fit into the idea of the man you see next to you”.

She allowed herself to sound silly for a moment and asked “really? and what, if I may ask, would that idea be? what is my idea of the ‘man’ I envision next to me? I am sure I am going to love this one”

I said “I don’t know, let’s run some tests. Do your mom and dad get along?” and she replied in the negative, saying she grew up with her mom. “Is your dad short and stocky like me, or tall and lean as your other boyfriends?” and she laughed again and when she caught her wind said “This is just hilarious”.

“OK”, I continued, “so let’s run with this new piece of data. Mom and dad don’t get along. Dad is short and stocky and so you go out with tall lean guys; all emotionally detached as to match your own modus operandis and the guys probably are of the outdoorsy type, forever carrying a backpack, resourceful -so you do not feel bad when you leave them- and of course they have got to be the muscular type; so they represent you as a person; I hate to use this term, but sort of a trophy boyfriend. He has to be a ‘down to hearth’ type of guy, who makes it a point to show the world that he does not mind sitting on the dirty floor. He only wears Timberlan look-alike shoes while never working up the nerve to buy the real thing -let it not be said he is vain-, and I could go on”.

“Please do not” she said, her laugh saturated the line; she added “to be further off the mark you’d have had to have described a little green man walking the surface of Mars, Pete. You have no idea what you are talking about, you have described a person I have never dated nor would ever date. I can show you pictures of my former boyfriends, if that would allow you to consider the remote  -remote to you, of course-  possibility that you may just be wrong”.

“As Ford Prefect said, ‘prove it to me, and I still won’t believe it’. Gosh I loved that book”, she added “never mind the book, but if proof does not constitute proof, couldn’t that suggest that this is just wishful thinking on your behalf?” and I said “nahhh, I could quote references all night. Working Girl, when Harrison Ford is offered the explanation “Maybe I just don’t like you” by Griffith when being denied an invitation to dinner, he replies ‘who, ME? nahhh’.”

She said “You seem to be diverting a bit from the main point for someone who manifests to be holding a supreme truth in one hand and the book of life in the other”, and I added “as I said, we need not discuss this any further, as we would incur in needless repetition. We each had our say; we can move on now”.

“It was just getting interesting” she said. “Well,” I interjected, “I was just losing interest. I say lower taxes, you say raise taxes. I can tell you that the candidates never come to an agreement, they just go round and round; so we may as well leave it at that”.

“It would never work” she said. I asked her “What would never work?” and she said “I can tell you, I’ve gotten to know you; and I am not the one”.

I said “You try hard at times not to be the one -and you excel at it with rare dexterity- but when you forget how much I get on your nerves and relax a bit we get along doggedly.” Then I paused. “And,” I added, “There is nothing that would or could not ‘work’, as you insist on insisting that you do not like me”. She said “I am sure it’s written somewhere that you are not allow to say what you just did, but I am going to ‘insist on insisting’, I do not like you.”

“As you know”, I said, “I have to read a lot for my work, and I have to write a lot. I am sometimes confined to unfamiliar offices for unseemly stretches of times, so I have taken to buying DVDs of TV series that like-minded friends recommend. I watched Dr. House. There is this great part in which he is doing a mass job interview in which he eliminates candidates, who are sitting in a classroom, based on their answers to his questions. At a given moment he challenges them to suggest a diagnosis for a series of symptoms. The most attractive woman in the rooms offers an answer, and he looks like he is about to agree with her, but then thinks better of it, scans the room and asks the least attractive guy to ‘repeat what she just said’, and the guy does. ‘As I suspected’, he says to nobody in particular. Then looks at the woman and says “no, you are wrong, you are fired’ “

I allowed her a few moments to make the connection, but she did not need them.

“Yes,” she said, with theatrical effort added to each word, “I told you, I do not like you. That means that I do not find you attractive; and I can assure you it guilts me not. I am fine with being a mammal and wanting to mate with good looking samples of my species. Looks are not all, but as you put it yourself with unchallengeable loquacity not a week ago ‘aptitudes are fine and all in a partner, but we do have to mate form time to time’, so yes, if you are suggesting that I am vain for requiring attractiveness from the guy I date, then I am fine with that.”

“But you do find me attractive” I said, “just not in a way you are used to. You have taken to touching me lately, you hold me by the shoulders, touch my back, grab my arm, you have even offered your hand for me to hold at table, on your birthday. You will now say that you do that with all our friends, but you do not.”

“Predicting the answer does not mean it is the wrong one, you know” she said, “you are very familiar with words, but you cannot pull those tricks on me. Just because you know what I am going to say it does not mean that my reply is true or not. I do hold hands with some friends, I can give you their telephone numbers if you like. I also do not like them. I know when I like a guy and believe you me, I do not like you and, you were right, this conversation did get boring” she said.

I went on “Oh?, now look who’s walking away from the arena. I tell you that you do like me in a new non-familiar way and what?, you are done talking?”

I could almost hear her thinking. “You are the guy, no wait, let me add to that: from the ‘guys I don’t like’ group of guys you might even be the one who I like the most, but I am sorry to be repetitive here, ‘just not that way’, how is that?”.

“Well,” I said “that’s a start. For you, I mean. For you to aknowledge that I am, presently, the guy you like the most, it’s a good start for you. As for me, I know what I know; please let us not speak more of this earthbound things”. I could hear her breathing on the line.

I inhaled and then continued, “Should we make plans for the weekend?” and she answered a <<yes, let us make plans>> that was not without a charge of warnings; warnings which I can swear crackled like long-ago-dried logs, on a lively fire. Her yes said “yes, but let’s just be friends”.

El más sabio

Más sabe el diablo por google que por diablo

 

Alessio

He wasn’t there

Ayer, en las escaleras,
me crucé con un hombre que no estaba
Hoy otra vez ahí no estaba
Deseo, deseo que se vaya…

 

Texto original

Yesterday, upon the stair,
I met a man who wasn’t there
He wasn’t there again today
I wish, I wish he’d go away…

When I came home last night at three
The man was waiting there for me
But when I looked around the hall
I couldn’t see him there at all!
Go away, go away, don’t you come back any more!
Go away, go away, and please don’t slam the door… (slam!)

Last night I saw upon the stair
A little man who wasn’t there
He wasn’t there again today
Oh, how I wish he’d go away

Cada cual en su lugar. No lo digo yo, es el orden natural

“Sabemos, sin embargo, que durante los últimos tres mil años la civilización occidental y sus precursoras —como también la mayoría de las demás civilizaciones— se han basado en un sistema filosófico, social y político en el que los hombres —por la fuerza, por presión directa o por medio de ritos, tradiciones, leyes, lenguaje, costumbres, ceremonias, educación y división del trabajo— determinan el papel que las mujeres deben o no desempeñar y por el cual la mujer está siempre sometida al hombre.
El poder del patriarcado es sumamente difícil de entender puesto que lo envuelve todo.
La institución ha influido en las ideas más fundamentales sobre la naturaleza humana —la naturaleza del «hombre», en lenguaje patriarcal— y sobre la relación del individuo con el universo.
Es el único sistema que hasta hace muy poco tiempo no había sido jamás desafiado abiertamente en la historia y cuyas doctrinas habían tenido una aceptación tan universal que parecían ser una ley de la naturaleza: de hecho, a menudo se las presentaba como tal.
Hoy, sin embargo, la desintegración del patriarcado es inminente.
El movimiento feminista es una de las corrientes culturales más combativas de nuestro tiempo y sus ideas repercutirán profundamente en nuestra futura evolución.”
…[Como consecuencia del la configuración patriarcal]… “la competencia se ha considerado la fuerza motriz de la economía y el «enfoque agresivo» ha devenido el ideal en el mundo de los negocios; esta conducta, junto con la expoliación de los recursos naturales, ha engendrado una serie de modelos de consumo competitivo.
Un comportamiento basado únicamente en la agresividad y la competitividad, por supuesto, haría imposible nuestras vidas.
Hasta los individuos más ambiciosos tienen necesidad de apoyo moral, comprensión, contacto humano y momentos de espontaneidad despreocupada y de reposo.
En nuestra cultura se espera —y a menudo se obliga— a las mujeres a satisfacer estas necesidades.
Ellas son las secretarias, las recepcionistas, las anfitrionas, las enfermeras y las amas de casa que realizan los servicios que facilitan la vida del hombre y les crean la atmósfera que necesitan para tener éxito en su empresa.
Dan apoyo moral a sus jefes y les preparan café; ayudan a limar asperezas en la oficina y son las primeras en recibir a las visitas y entretenerlas con su amena charla.
En los consultorios médicos y en los hospitales, las mujeres proporcionan la mayor parte del contacto humano a los pacientes que inician el proceso de curación; en los departamentos de física las mujeres hacen té y ofrecen galletitas a los hombres mientras ellos discuten sus teorías.
Todos estos servicios corresponden a una actividad yin o integradora —de nivel inferior a una actividad yang o autoafirmante, en nuestra escala de valores— y por ello las personas que los realizan ganan menos dinero.
De hecho, muchas de estas personas —las madres y las amas de casa, por ejemplo— lo hacen gratis”

- Del libro Punto Crucial, de Capra Fritjof

Coto y tu mamá

Amigos y amigas: Cuando su pareja diga “que copado irnos al Congo un año, luego hacer de voluntarios en la Legión Extranjera y después mudarnos a la luna y comenzar una nueva civilización” ustedes deben decirle “si, mi vida. Con vos voy a donde quieras”. Verán, el 99,999% de la gente que dice eso nunca se va a ningún lado. Si le dicen que si, la persona se sentirá apoyada y libre. Si le dicen “mirá, salvar vidas y todo esto está copado, pero yo necesito vivir cerca de mi mamá y del Coto para que no me falte nunca yerba mate” van a hacer que la persona se sienta anclada, atrapada y mal aparejada.

No es necesario que mientan; todo lo contrario; busquen dentro de sí al loco aventurero que en algún momento de su vida quería ir a hacer expediciones al Amazonas y logren que esa parte se conecte con la parte de su pareja que se quiere ir al Congo. Nunca saben, quizá si se atreven a soñar se atrevan un día a vivir.

Por otro lado, si una persona decide irse al Congo con Cocineros sin Fronteras o a Tishikistan a dar clases de matemática para dejar atrás a la mamá y la yerba mate, ninguna cantidad de caras largas y quejas acerca de lo mucho que trabajaron para comprar las mesitas de noche y la cortina la van a detener.

Y seré como tu, maldito

No entiendo cómo la izquierda tiene este desprecio y hasta odio por la gente con dinero. Si el plan de la izquierda es que todos tengan dinero, no puede ser tan malo quién lo tiene, ¿no?

Agencia Judía de Noticias de Alessio Aguirre-Pimentel: Comunicado 001

No se sabe bien, pero se cree que somos unos catorce millones de judíos alrededor del mundo.

Menos del 4% son ortodoxos.

Cuando el 90% de la gente piensa en los judíos se imagina un tipo con sombrero y barba caminando rápido por la calle con cara de apurado. El que hace eso se está olvidando del 96% de los judíos.

Cuando le digo a alguien que soy judío me dice “¿si?, sos el primer judío que conozco”, y les explico que no es así; que así como todos los hinchas de chacarita no andan con la remera puesta todo el día, los judíos no andan todo el día con un cartel que dice que son judíos. Conocés muchos judíos y te los cruzás en la calle todo el tiempo, solo que no te das cuenta. 

Habiendo dicho esto, hay un gran revuelo en las redes por una noticia que autoriza a un grupo de lunáticos en NY a succionarle el pene a los recién nacidos a los que se les hace la circuncición ritual.

Primero: en algunos países de Centro y Suramérica la circuncisión es vista como algo muy raro, pero en EEUU y muchos otros países a los niños se los circuncida al nacer por motivos de higiene y salud. Todos los niños, de todas las religiones. La mayoría de los gringos están circuncidados.

En Argentina, por ejemplo, hay que defender la circuncisión en las charlas entre amigos  pero en USA cualquier persona, de cualquier religión, diría “claro que hay que circuncidar a los niños, que asco sino”.

Entonces, la noticia no trata, dentro del contexto de la misma, de la circuncisión sino de cómo higieniza a los bebés luego de la misma.

Comencemos: esta noticia trata de un grupo reducido dentro de la ortodoxia, es decir, un grupo reducido dentro de un grupo reducido, que insiste con hacer las cosa como ellos alucinan que se hacían hace cuatro mil años. Están, como muchas otras personas alrededor del mundo: locos. Están locos porque están locos, no porque son judíos. 

Las circuncisiones rituales no las hacen los rabinos, sino un Mohél. En Argentina, el mohél de los no-ortodoxos es un médico urólogo. Trabaja con todo esterilizado, guantes, gazas, y tiene siempre y un desfibrilador en el baúl de su auto en caso de emergencias.

No sé qué hacen en NY, pero es la primera vez que escucho que un mohél use la boca para limpiar la sangre, siempre he visto que usan gazas estériles. Esta gente está claramente loca y no representa para nada a los judíos que conozco, ni los ortodoxos ni los no ortodoxos.

Atentos saludos,

Un judío.

ver: http://goo.gl/TTNkf